Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Early and Delayed Transplantation After SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Our study analyzed 95 solid organ transplant (SOT) and 78 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients who underwent transplantation within 30 days of COVID-19 infection comprised the early group, and those who underwent transplantation post-30 days of COVID-19 infection comprised the delayed group. In the early transplantation group, no patient, whether undergoing SOT and HSCT, experienced COVID-19-associated complications. In the delayed transplantation group, one patient each from SOT and HSCT experienced COVID-19-associated complications. Additionally, among early SOT and HSCT recipients, two and six patients underwent transplantation within seven days of COVID-19 diagnosis, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in the clinical outcomes of these patients compared to those in other patients. Early transplantation following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection can be performed without increased risk of COVID-19-associated complications. Therefore, transplantation needs not be delayed by COVID-19 infection.

Persistent fever after coronavirus disease 2019 in liver/kidney transplant recipient.

In this case, a 64-year-old male with a history of simultaneous orthotopic liver transplant and cadaveric renal transplant presented five years prior presented with persistent fevers two days after a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasal PCR. A CT scan of the chest on hospital day nine revealed innumerable 1-2 mm nodules in a miliary pattern throughout the lung. (1,3)-ß-D-glucan on hospital day 11 was 133 pg/mL. In this article, the approach, diagnostic and management strategies for patients with persistent fevers after diagnosis of COVID-19 in a transplant recipient are discussed.

In Vitro Profiling of Commonly Used Post-transplant Immunosuppressants Reveals Distinct Impact on Antiviral T-cell Immunity Towards CMV.

Infectious complications, including widespread human cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, frequently occur after hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplantation due to immunosuppressive treatment causing impairment of T-cell immunity. Therefore, in-depth analysis of the impact of immunosuppressants on antiviral T cells is needed. We analyzed the impact of mTOR inhibitors sirolimus (SIR/S) and everolimus (EVR/E), calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus (TAC/T), purine synthesis inhibitor mycophenolic acid (MPA/M), glucocorticoid prednisolone (PRE/P) and common double (T+S/E/M/P) and triple (T+S/E/M+P) combinations on antiviral T-cell functionality. T-cell activation and effector molecule production upon antigenic stimulation was impaired in presence of T+P and triple combinations. SIR, EVR and MPA exclusively inhibited T-cell proliferation, TAC inhibited activation and cytokine production and PRE inhibited various aspects of T-cell functionality including cytotoxicity. This was reflected in an in vitro infection model, where elimination of CMV-infected human fibroblasts by CMV-specific T cells was reduced in presence of PRE and all triple combinations. CMV-specific memory T cells were inhibited by TAC and PRE, which was also reflected with double (T+P) and triple combinations. EBV- and SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells were similarly affected. These results highlight the need to optimize immune monitoring to identify patients who may benefit from individually tailored immunosuppression.

Monitoring Humoral Response Following BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation Patients: A Single-Center Prospective Study along with a Brief Review of Current Literature.

Data on antibody response (AR) after vaccination against SARS-CoV2 in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation setting (HSCT) were initially scarce, mainly due to the exclusion of such patients from approval studies. Shortly after the worldwide application of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in vulnerable populations such as patients with hematologic malignancies, limited single-center trials, including HSCT patients, were published. However, there was a great heterogeneity between them regarding the type of underlying malignancy, co-current treatment, type of vaccine, method of AR measurement, and time point of AR measurement. Herein, we present the results of a prospective study on AR after vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 using the BNT162b2 vaccine in a cohort of 54 HSCT recipients-mostly autologous from a single Unit-along with a broad review of the current literature. In our cohort, the AR positivity rate at 1 month was 80.8% and remained positive in 85.7% of patients at 3 months after vaccination. There were only nine non-responders, who were more heavily pretreated and more frequently hypogammaglobulinemic compared to responders. High antibody titers (AT), [AT ≥ 1000 U/mL], were detected in 38.5% and 30.6% of the patients at m1 and m3, respectively. A significant decline in AT between m1 and m3 was demonstrated-p < 0.0001; median AT1 and AT3 were 480.5 and 293 U/mL, respectively. A novel finding of our study was the negative impact of IgA hypogammaglobulinemia on response to vaccination. Other negative significant factors were treatment with anti-CD20 antibody at vaccination and vaccination within 18 months from HSCT. Our data indicate that HSCT recipients elicit a positive response to the BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 when vaccinated at 6 months post-transplant, and vaccination should be offered to this patient population even within the post-pandemic COVID-19 era.

Beyond prevention: Unveiling the benefits of triple vaccination on COVID-19 severity and resource utilization in solid organ transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the widespread reduction in COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality attributed to vaccination in the general population, vaccine efficacy in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) remains under-characterized. This study aimed to investigate clinically relevant outcomes on double and triple-vaccinated versus unvaccinated SOTR with COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study was performed utilizing data from the US Collaborative Network Database within TriNetX (n = 117,905,631). We recruited vaccinated and unvaccinated (matched controls) SOTR with COVID-19 over two time periods to control for vaccine availability: December 2020 to October 2022 (bi-dose, double-dose vaccine effectiveness) and December 2020 to April 2023 (tri-dose, triple-dose vaccine effectiveness). A total of 42 factors associated with COVID-19 disease severity were controlled for including age, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. We monitored 30-day outcomes including acute respiratory failure, intubation, and death following a diagnosis of COVID-19. RESULTS: Subjects were categorized into two cohorts based on the two time periods: bi-dose cohort (vaccinated, n = 462; unvaccinated, n = 20,998); tri-dose cohort (vaccinated, n = 517; unvaccinated, n = 23,061).Compared to unvaccinated SOTR, 30-day mortality was significantly lower for vaccinated subjects in both cohorts: tri-dose (2.0% vs 7.5%, HR = 0.22 [95% CI: 0.11, 0.46]); bi-dose (3.7% vs 8.2%, HR = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.24, 0.76]). Hospital admission rates were similar between bi-dose vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects (33.1% vs 28.6%, HR = 1.2 [95% CI: 0.95, 1.52]). In contrast, tri-dose vaccinated subjects had a significantly lower likelihood of hospital admission (29.4% vs 36.6%, HR = 0.74 [95% CI: 0.6, 0.91]). Intubation rates were significantly lower for triple-vaccinated- (2.3% vs 5.2%, p < 0.05), but not double-vaccinated subjects (3.0% vs 5.2%, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19, triple vaccination, but not double vaccination, against SARS-CoV-2 was associated with significantly less hospital resource utilization, decreased disease severity, and fewer short-term complications. These real-world data from extensively matched controls support the protective effects of COVID-19 vaccination with boosters in this vulnerable population.

ABO-Incompatible Renal Transplant: A Single-Center Experience from India.

Introduction: In view of ever-increasing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population but inadequate availability of suitable donors, ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation can be an important void filler. However, at present, ABOi transplantation is limited to a few centers in India and there is a lack of adequate experience and expertise to guide this program to other centers in the country. Methods: Data of all the ABOi transplants performed from 2012 to 2021 in a tertiary care hospital was retrospectively analyzed. The anti-ABO antibody (IgG) titers (≤1:4) were considered safe before transplantation. Desensitization included rituximab, plasma exchange, or selective immunoadsorption column. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were initiated at day -7. Induction agents included ATG, ATLG, basiliximab, or no induction. Postoperatively, anti-ABO titers were done daily for 2 weeks. Results: A total of 202 patients underwent transplantation; of these, 195 patients whose data were for available for 12 months were included in the study. Mean duration of follow-up was 28.9 ± 21.7 months. UTI was the most common source of infection, occurring in almost half (46.1%) of the patients. Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR; 15%) was common in the first year. Patient survival was 86.6% (169/195) at 1 year. Sepsis was the most common of death in more than two-thirds of the population, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated mortality in nine patients (4.6%). Death-censored graft survival was 89.3% (174/195). AMR was the leading cause of graft loss in almost half of the patients. Conclusion: ABOi should be considered in ESRD patients for whom suitable ABO-compatible donor is not available. Higher rate of rejection and infection are still a major concern.

Quality of life in the digital age: young adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients and healthcare providers' views of telehealth.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic shifted the healthcare field from in-person clinic visits to virtual-based telehealth appointments. This study explored young adult (YA) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patient and physician communication preferences and quality of life. METHODS: One researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with n = 10 YA HSCT patients and n = 10 healthcare providers (HPs). HPs included physicians (n = 5) and advanced practice provider (APP) (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) (n = 5). Interviews lasted approximately 10-15 min, were held over Zoom®, and were audio-recorded. Interviews were professionally transcribed verbatim, and two independent researchers conducted a thematic analysis using Dedoose®. RESULTS: Common themes included the following: (1) convenience, (2) improved communication, (3) technology issues, and (4) quality of life for patients and physicians. In general, most patients (n = 7; 70%) preferred in-person visits over telehealth for initial appointments, stating they chose the "social connection" and "engagement" associated with in-person visits. For "check-ins" and follow-up appointments (n = 5; 50%), patients preferred hybrid appointments. Physicians (n = 4; 80%) preferred telehealth stating it was "convenient," "timesaving," and improved "compliance." In contrast, all APP staff (n = 5; 100%) preferred in-person visits, stating in-person improved "relationships" with patients and was more "convenient" than using electronic devices for telehealth. CONCLUSION: Providers differed in preference. APP personnel preferred in-person visits and HSCT physicians preferred telehealth appointments. YA HSCT patients preferred in-person for initial appointments and hybrid clinic visits for follow-up appointments.

COVID-19 surveillance in a bone marrow transplantation unit: experience from a Brazilian tertiary-care teaching hospital.

PURPOSE: In this work, we aimed to describe the strategy of the weekly SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR surveillance program that was implemented in our bone marrow transplantation (BMT) unit. METHODS: Our unit performed SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR before admission and then weekly during hospitalization even if the patient was asymptomatic. From May 2021 to May 2022, we collected data from all patients that were admitted in the BMT unit to perform transplantation. The total of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR performed and the positive rate were described. RESULTS: During the study period, 65 patients were admitted for HSCT. A total of 414 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR were performed. Two cases were detected (positivity rate, 0.48%). After the positive test, both patients were isolated outside the BMT unit. CONCLUSION: We postulate that diagnosing these patients and isolating them outside the transplantation unit may have prevented secondary symptomatic cases.

Kidney Transplantation During COVID-19 Outbreak: Data From Public and Non-Public Dialysis Network.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected medical services in Poland. All restrictions, additional procedures, and numerous infections among medical staff affected transplantation in the country. This study aimed to analyze reports prepared by the Polish Transplant Coordination Center Poltransplant and internal Fresenius Nephrocare Poland to assess differences in the number of patients who qualified for kidney transplantation and transplanted during the pandemic compared with a pre-pandemic year. METHODS: Official data from the Polish Transplant Coordinating Centre Poltransplant bulletin from 2019, 2020, and 2021 was analyzed to determine the number of patients on the waiting list for solid organ transplantation. The number of transplantations reported by Polish transplant centers was also considered. RESULTS: During the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, the number of qualified and transplanted patients was significantly lower than in the pre-pandemic period. The worst data concerns the new qualifications, which were significantly lower in the first year of the pandemic due to all the restrictions implemented. The number of kidney transplant procedures provided during the 2-year pandemic period decreased significantly (-20.8%) in 2020, and in the second year, the negative trend continued (-0.8%). For private dialysis providers, the number of active patients on the waiting list for kidney transplantation was a bit better-it decreased from 265 to 239 in 2020 (-9.8%) and increased to 259 in 2021 (+8.4%). The decline in the number of patients treated in Fresenius Nephrocare dialysis centers was more significant, decreasing by 27.8% in 2020 compared with 2019. In 2021, the number of transplanted patients slightly increased by about 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in qualified and transplanted patients during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak clearly shows the need to undertake multidisciplinary discussions among all stakeholders to create new procedures and processes that will help protect the health care system and patients in future crisis situations.

Risk of Corneal Transplant Rejection Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has initiated an unparalleled global vaccination campaign, raising concerns about the vaccine's effects on various health conditions, including the risk of corneal transplant rejection. This systematic review aimed to identify the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and rejection of corneal transplant, filling a significant gap in the existing medical literature. METHODS: A literature search was performed across multiple databases up to February 12, 2024, to identify studies evaluating the risk of corneal transplant rejection post-COVID-19 vaccination. Eligible studies were original research that reported outcomes of corneal graft rejection following vaccination. Nested Knowledge web software facilitated screening and data extraction. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed for quality assessment. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the aggregated relative risk (RR) utilizing R software version 4.3. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, with four meeting the criteria for meta-analysis. These studies varied in geographic location, surgical techniques, and types of vaccines used. The pooled RR for corneal transplant rejection following COVID-19 vaccination was 0.816 (95% CI 0.178-1.453), indicating no significant risk of rejection. No statistical heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: This review and meta-analysis found no significant evidence that COVID-19 vaccination increases the risk of corneal graft rejection. However, the current evidence is insufficient to conclusively determine the vaccine's safety for corneal transplant recipients. These findings underscore the need for additional research to confirm these preliminary results and investigate the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccination on corneal transplants, aiming to provide evidence-based guidance to healthcare providers and patients.

COVID-19 and renal allograft rejection: insight from controlled and non-controlled studies.

AIM: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), due to their immunosuppressed status, are potentially more susceptible to both the severe effects of COVID-19 and complications in their transplanted organ. The aim of this study is to investigate whether COVID-19 infection increases the risk of rejection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). METHODS: This study involved a detailed literature review, conducted using PubMed, with the search being completed by September 7th, 2023. The search strategy incorporated a combination of relevant keywords: 'COVID', 'Renal', 'Kidney', 'Transplant', and 'Rejection'. The results from controlled and uncontrolled studies were separately collated and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were identified, encompassing 1,179 patients. Among these, two controlled studies reported the incidence of rejection in KTRs infected with COVID-19. Pooling data from these studies revealed no significant statistical correlation between COVID-19 infection and biopsy-proven rejection (p = 0.26). In addition, nine non-controlled studies were found, with rejection incidences ranging from 0% to 66.7%. The majority of these studies (eight out of nine) had small sample sizes, ranging from 3 to 75 KTRs, while the largest included 372 KTRs. The combined rejection rate across these studies was calculated to be 11.8%. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the limited number of published controlled studies revealed no statistically significant association between COVID-19 infection and biopsy-proven rejection among KTRs. However, the broader analysis of non-controlled studies showed a variable rejection incidence with a pooled rejection rate of 11.8%. There is insufficient high-quality data to explore the association of COVID-19 infection and rejection.

Prevention and treatment strategies for kidney transplant recipients in the context of long-term existence of COVID-19.

The sudden outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in early 2020 posed a massive threat to human life and caused an economic upheaval worldwide. Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) became susceptible to infection during the COVID-19 pandemic owing to their use of immunosuppressants, resulting in increased hospitalization and mortality rates. Although the current epidemic situation is alleviated, the long-term existence of COVID-19 still seriously threatens the life and health of KTRs with low immunity. The Omicron variant, a highly infectious but less-pathogenic strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has raised concerns among transplant physicians regarding managing KTRs diagnosed with this variant. However, currently, there are no clear and unified guidelines for caring for KTRs infected with this variant. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the ongoing research on drugs that can treat Omicron variant infections in KTRs and explore the potential of adjusting immunotherapy strategies to enhance their responsiveness to vaccines. Herein, we discuss the situation of KTRs since the emergence of COVID-19 and focus on various prevention and treatment strategies for KTRs since the Omicron variant outbreak. We hope to assist physicians in managing KTRs in the presence of long-term COVID-19 variants.

COVID-19 outcomes in haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in Western Australia: the value of vaccination and antiviral therapy.

Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) mortality rates among haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients are high, ranging between 20% and 40%. We prospectively evaluated the mortality outcomes of COVID-19 in Western Australian HSCT patients. A total of 32/492 (6.5%) HSCT recipients contracted COVID-19 during the study, of whom 30/32 (94%) developed mild or asymptomatic disease. Two allogeneic HSCT patients were hospitalised for severe COVID-19; one patient died. Stringent healthcare, social isolation practices, aggressive vaccination programmes and rapid access to COVID-19 antivirals may have promoted mild COVID-19 illness in Western Australian HSCT patients, resulting in one of the lowest COVID-19 mortality rates in HSCT recipients worldwide.

Developments in Hand Surgery: Experience from a Tertiary Hospital of Northern Bangladesh.

Hand Surgery is a specialized branch of Plastic and Reconstructive surgery. There are many conditions that require hand surgery, for example, congenital deformity, electric or flame burn, mechanical or road traffic injury, and post burn or post traumatic deformity. A retrospective observational study was conducted in the department of Burn and Plastic surgery, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh during a 2 years period extending from 9th September 2021 to 8th September 2023. The objective of this study was to see the hand surgery status in a tertiary hospital of Bangladesh during the post Covid pandemic period. During this period 236 hand surgery procedures were performed in 176 patients. The age of the patients ranged from 02 to 78 years (Mean 31.14±1.52). One hundred and four (59.0%) were male and 72(41.0%) were female. Thirty-four (19.32%) patients had co-morbidities e.g., Epilepsy, Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Diseases and HBsAg +ve. Causes of surgery included, wound due to electric burn 49(27.84%), flame burn 36(20.45%), post traumatic 24(13.64%), post infective 11(06.25%), tumor excision 02(2.24%), Dupuytren's contracture 03(1.70%), congenital anomalies 06(3.41%), post burn scar contractures 41(23.29%), nerve injury 01(00.57%) and carpal tunnel syndrome 01 (00.57%). Procedures were performed: post burn scar contracture release 41(17.37%), syndactly release 06(2.54%), release of post traumatic contracture 06(2.54%), carpal tunnel release 01(00.42%), release of Dupuytren's contracture 03(01.27%), nerve repair 01(00.42%), debridement, amputation and Fillet flap 29(12.29%), split thickness skin graft 46 (19.49%), V-Y advancement flap 06(2.54%), transposition flap 18(07.63%), cross finger flap 16 (06.78%), reverse cross finger flap 02 (00.85%), first dorsal metacarpal artery (FDMA) flap 05 (02.12%), reverse FDMA flap 01 (00.42%), metacarpal artery perforator flap 08(3.39%), radial artery perforator flap 04(01.69%), posterior interosseous artery flap 05(2.12%), abdominal flap 11(04.46%) and flap division and insetting 27(11.44%). Outcome of surgery was satisfactory in 225(95.34%) and 11(04.46%) cases had complications (p value 0.453), which was not significant. So, it can be concluded that the outcome of various types of hand surgery procedures in tertiary hospital of northern Bangladesh during the post Covid period was satisfactory overall.

Pharmaco-economic evaluation of kidney transplantation at the University Hospital Establishment of Oran: cost analysis and implications / Évaluation pharmaco-économique de la transplantation rénale à l'établissement hospitalier et universitaire d'Oran : analyse des coûts et implications.

Introduction: In Algeria, the number of patients treated by dialysis is estimated at 23,798 in 2019. Kidney transplantation is the best therapeutic option for patients suffering from end stage kidney Disease (ESKD). However, this procedure is costly and requires complex management. The aim of this study is to assess the costs associated with kidney transplantation at the University Hospital Establishment of Oran, Algeria (UHEO). Materials and methods: A retrospective, descriptive, monocentric study was carried out on 31 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at the UHEO. Estimated costs included drugs, consumables, imaging and laboratory tests for pre-transplant examinations, immediate post-transplant hospitalization, post-transplant follow-up and management of any complications. Results: The average cost of graft preparation was 485,438.31 Algerian Dinar (DZD). Immediate post-transplant hospitalization represented an average cost of 375,484.70 DZD. The first year post-transplantation was the most costly with an average cost of 1,305,197.40 DZD mainly attributed to treatment, hospitalization, clinical and paraclinical examinations. Conclusion: This study estimated the cost of kidney transplantation at the UHEO and revealed that the cost of the first year is the most important due to many factors. It also showed that costs tend to decrease with the age of the transplant and the clinical stability of the recipient.

Introduction: En Algérie, le nombre de patients traités par la dialyse est estimé à 23 798 en 2019. La transplantation rénale se positionne comme la meilleure option thérapeutique pour les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique terminale (IRCT). Cependant, cette procédure est coûteuse et nécessite une prise en charge complexe. Cette étude a pour objectif d'évaluer les coûts associés à la transplantation rénale à l'établissement hospitalier et universitaire d'Oran en Algérie (EHUO). Matériels et méthodes: Une étude rétrospective, descriptive et monocentrique a été menée sur 31 patients ayant subi une transplantation rénale avec un donneur vivant apparenté à l'EHUO. Les coûts estimés englobaient les médicaments, les consommables, l'imagerie et les bilans biologiques dans les examens pré-greffe du donneur et du receveur, l'hospitalisation post-greffe immédiate, le suivi post-greffe et la gestion d'éventuelles complications. Résultats: Le coût moyen de la préparation de la greffe était de 485 438,31 Dinar algérien (DZD). L'hospitalisation post-greffe immédiate a représenté un coût moyen de 375 484,70 DZD. La première année de la greffe était la plus coûteuse avec un coût moyen de 1 305 197,40 DZD principalement attribué au traitement, à l'hospitalisation et aux examens cliniques et paracliniques. Les infections urinaires, la Covid-19 et les complications chirurgicales étaient les complications les plus fréquentes. Une variabilité significative a été observée en fonction du type de complications allant de 1 785,48 à 654 214,60 DZD. Le rejet aigu du greffon a été associé au coût moyen le plus élevé. Conclusion: Cette étude a permis d'estimer le coût de la greffe rénale à l'EHUO et a révélé que le coût de la première année est le plus important en raison de plusieurs facteurs. Elle a également montré que les coûts ont tendance à diminuer au fur à mesure de l'ancienneté de la greffe et la stabilité clinique du receveur.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in Mexico City.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are among patients with highest risk of adverse coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We compared clinical outcomes in post-HSCT patients with COVID-19 before and during the Omicron period. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study including patients post-HSCT with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection from April 2020 to March 2023 at Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City. We describe their clinical characteristics and report the variables associated with severe clinical disease, hospitalization, and death. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included; 31 (58.5%) from the pre-Omicron period and 22 (41.5%) from the Omicron period. Median age was 42-years old (interquartile range 26-53), and 31 patients (59%) were men. Only four patients (16%) had received a vaccine prior to COVID-19 diagnosis in the pre-Omicron period versus 20 (91%) in the Omicron period (p < 0.001). COVID-19 severe cases were more common before Omicron: seven patients (23%) versus two patients (9%). Only one patient (3%) received an antiviral in the pre-Omicron period compared to 11 patients (50%) during the Omicron period (p < 0.01). COVID-19-associated mortality was almost double in the pre-Omicron period (16% vs. 9%, p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: This study reports patients with a high proportion of severe outcomes during the first 2 years of the pandemic. Outcomes improved during Omicron with better access to vaccines and antivirals and no in-hospital cases. Variables associated with worse outcomes were similar to other reports. Strengthening infection control measures in the hospital and better access to preventive strategies and therapeutic options are mandatory in these high-risk patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019-related hepatic transplant pseudoaneurysm.

Coronavirus disease 2019-related transplant hepatic pseudoaneurysms have not been reported but can be life-threatening. They can be either solitary or multiple and can grow rapidly within weeks. They should be classified as mycotic and treated on an emergent basis. Both stenting of the vessel and coil embolization can potentially be viable treatment options of coronavirus disease 2019-related pseudoaneurysms.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung transplant patients and on a cohort of patients with rare lung disease: A single-center study.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, France underwent several lockdown periods during 2020. Our aim was to evaluate its clinical and social impact on lung transplant (LT) patients treated at Strasbourg University Hospital, by comparing three periods: first lockdown (T1: March-May 2020), end of the first lockdown (T2: May-October 2020), and second lockdown (T3: November-December 2020) and the incidence of COVID-19 infections. A cohort of patients with rare lung disease (RLD) was also studied during T2. METHODS: We used clinical and paraclinical data collected during routine follow-up. A questionnaire was submitted to each patient at each period to assess their lifestyle, adherence to protective measures against COVID-19, contacts with their family and friends, and contagion risk. The incidence of new COVID-19 cases was also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 283 LT and 57 RLD patients were included. We observed only eight COVID-19 cases over the three periods (n = 4 during T1, n = 0 during T2, and n = 4 during T3) in LT patients, with 37.5 % of patients hospitalized, no ICU transfers, and 100 % favorable outcomes. No case of COVID-19 was diagnosed in the RLD cohort. When comparing the three periods in the LT group, fewer patients limited their out-of-home activities during T2 (p < 0.0001). The frequency of these activities increased after the first lockdown, for the purchase of basic necessities (p < 0.0001), and professional activity continued (p = 0.008). We observed a significant increase in unscheduled medical consultations and in the prescription of anti-infective treatments during the end of the lockdown (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.005, respectively). Adherence to lockdown and to protective measures was high in both groups of patients. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 incidence remained low in both groups and there were significant lifestyle evolutions in LT patients and in those with RLD between first and second lockdown.